Teacher Evaluation Form

1.	Curriculum Alignment*
	Curriculum Alignment* No relationship to the curriculum or learning standards. Some relationship to the curriculum and standards. Aligns closely to the curriculum standards.

2.	Learning Experience *
	Learning Experience * No authentic tasks. Setting could be easily replicated in the classroom. Several authentic tasks not easily replicated in the classroom. An authentic learning environment with real life tasks and problems unable to be replicated.

3.	Learning Outcomes *
	Learning Outcomes * Few students realized by desired learning outcomes. Difficult to determine level of student success. Many of the students seemed to demonstrate my desired learning outcomes. All the students clearly demonstrated success in reaching and exceeding my desired learning outcomes

4.	Student Engagement *
	Student Engagement * Students seldom on task. Uninterested in simulation. Students spend some time on task, but would like to see them more engaged for longer periods of time Students engaged as much as possible. Students reluctant to stop working. Highly motivated.

5.	Teacher Impact *
	I teach exactly the same as I always have. Experience had no impact on my teaching style.    I already do hands-on activities with my students.    After this experience I am motivated to try even more of activities with my students.    I am going to create more authentic learning experiences for my students as a result.

6.	Intermediate Science Exam *
	Intermediate Science Exam * No relation to exam. Some relationship to exam, but would like to see more of a correlation. Provides process skill practice at several stations that align directly with the exam.

7.	Website*
	Not helpful. Don't use it. Irrelevant to experience.    I use the web site to get information and forms, but do not use it as a learning tool for students.    Very helpful.    Log on regularly pre- and post-experience.    Site extends learning.    Allows students to extend beyond experience.

8.	Overall Environment*
	Equipment undependable and outdated.    Simulator not well maintained.    Poor quality of environment affected experience.    Adequate equipment.    Some problems with equipment but did not affect the experience.    Fairly well maintained.    State-of-the-art equipment.    No problems with equipment.    Simulator clean and well maintained.

9.	Quality of Instruction *
	Commanders were unenthusiastic.    Poor interaction with students and teacher.    Could not provide adequate support of student needs.    Lacked necessary knowledge to facilitate experience adequately.    Commanders were competent.    Somewhat enthusiastic.    Would have liked to see more student interaction.    Lacked knowledge but didn't interfere with the experience.    Commanders were very enthusiastic.    Motivated students.    Sensitive to special needs of students.    Very knowledgeable.

10.	Teacher Orientation*
	Teacher Orientation* I found the Teacher Orientation to be boring, inappropriate, and an ineffective use of time. Teacher Orientation was somewhat helpful, but not critical to a successful experience. I found the teacher orientation to be an integral part of a successful experience.

11.	Name of Commanders*

12.	Other Comments